EXAMINING ONLINE PLATFORMS OF STEM CENTRES FOR UPPING OUTDOOR STEM EDUCATION IN LATVIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol3.8525Keywords:
STEM, STEM centres, online platforms, outdoor STEM educationAbstract
For addressing the issue of regional inequalities in access to STEM education, the STEM centres are located in Riga, the capital city of Latvia, as well as other cities, namely Cesis, Liepaja, Sigulda, and Ventspils, established in different regions of Latvia. A visit to a STEM centre in Latvia starts with the investigation of its online platform. The aim of this work is to build a framework for the analysis of online platforms of STEM centres in Latvia. The guiding research questions is: What are functions and sub-functions of online platform of the STEM centre? The descriptive study is employed in this work. The study is aimed at identification of functions and sub-functions of online platforms belonging to STEM centres. In the digital age, online platforms ensure links between STEM centres and their visitors. Online platforms of STEM centres provide important information about STEM centre’s aims, functions, facilities, and services. Online platforms also serve as a communication tool (use of emails and similar) between the STEM centre and its clients as well as stakeholders. The theoretical analysis allows shaping the framework for analysis of online platforms belonging to STEM centres. The framework is built of key functions (organisation contact information, educational programmes, and training to services) and sub-functions that online platforms are expected to present. The comparative analysis based on the descriptive study shows that only two online platforms provide the information about all the sub-functions highlighted in the developed framework. Two platforms mostly disclose the sub-functions, and one platform partly covers the necessary information. It should be noted that four STEM centres that fully or mostly reveal the sub-functions have been supported by Norway grants or belong to Riga Technical University. Our theoretical analysis is limited by the number of existing scientific literature in English. Theoretical analysis in other languages than English may advance further development of online platform for strengthening of STEM education. Another limiting factor is that online platforms were observed by the researchers who took part in this study. Interviews or surveys with the participation of online platforms’ users might lead to the creation of a framework with other key functions and subfunctions. Practical implications on a design of online platforms for STEM centres imply that online platforms should be user friendly. Another important aspect is to include all the organisations details such as name, a short description (year of establishment, staff number, etc), address and email, phone number, social media, and location on the map. In regard to educational materials, important is to give open access to the educational materials to all the users. This might increase their interest to visit STEM Centre in person. Another practical implication is to unite the five STEM centres in Latvia in one network and to establish close collaboration between them. This collaboration would support the whole approach to outdoor STEM education, the development of systemic, sequential, and gradual educational materials. This would increase learners’ understanding of STEM education as well as sustainable development of Latvia. The links between five STEM centres in Latvia should also be shown on their online platforms.
References
K. Knipele, “Academic year 2023/24 has the smallest number of students in the past two decades”, Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia, 13 February 2024. [Online]. Available: https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/education/higher-education/press-releases/20762-topicalities-higher-education [Accessed February 4, 2025].
Rīgas Tehniskā universitāte, / RTU, “Šogad uzņemšanā vairāk reflektantu rtu izvēlējušies kā savu pirmo prioritāti”, 20 July 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.rtu.lv/lv/universitate/masu-medijiem/zinas/atvert/sogad-uznemsana-vairak-reflektantu-rtu-izvelejusies-ka-savu-pirmo-prioritati [Accessed February 4, 2025].
C. Campbell, W. Jobling, and C. Howitt, “Science in Early Childhood,” 3rd Edition, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
M. Hainsworth, “It's Easier than You Think! Exploring an Outdoor Pedagogy for Teaching Science”, Part 2, Primary Science, 158, 31-33, 2019.
A. Shinija, “Descriptive Research Design”, April 2024. [Online]. Available: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19205.36325, [Accessed February 5, 2025].
A. Ahrens, O. Purvinis, J. Zascerinska, D. Miceviciene, and A. Tautkus, “Burstiness Management for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth: Emerging Research and Opportunities”, IGI Global, 2018. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5442-4.
A. Batuchina, J. Melnikova, J. Zascerinska, and A. Ahrens, “Middle School Students’ Opinion about Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence Platforms:, 11th Eurasian Multidisciplinary Forum Conference, European Scientific Institute of Grigol Robakidze University, Tbilisi, Georgia. 21-22 September 2023.
J. Melnikova, A. Batuchina, J. Zascerinska, and A. Ahrens, “Learning Experience Platforms in German and Lithuanian K12 Schools: Case Study Analysis," 2023 International Interdisciplinary PhD Workshop (IIPhDW), Wismar, Germany, 2023, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/IIPhDW54739.2023.10124407.
N. R. Balyk, G. P. Shmyger, Ya. Ph. Vasylenko, and V. P. Oleksiuk, “STEM centre as a factor in the development of formal and non-formal STEM education”, XIV International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2288 (2022) 012030 IOP Publishing, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper No. 120646, 2022. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2288/1/012030. [Online]. Available: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/120646/. 23 Apr 2024. [Accessed February 5, 2025].
D.L. Carlisle and G.C. Weaver, “STEM education centers: catalyzing the improvement of undergraduate STEM education”, IJ STEM Ed 5, 47, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0143-2. [Accessed February 5, 2025].
N. Balyk, O. Barna, G. Shmyger, and V. Oleksiuk “ Model of professional retraining of teachers based on the development of stem competencies”, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications. Integration, Harmonization and Knowledge Transfer. Volume II: Workshops (ICTERI 2018 vol 2104) ed V. Ermolayev (CEUR-WS.org) pp 318–331, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2104/paper_157.pdf. [Accessed February 5, 2025].
J. Zaščerinska, A. Aļeksejeva, L. Aļeksejeva, L., N. Andreeva, O. Gloņina, and M. Zaščerinskis, “ E-Learning in Non-Formal Adult Education in Latvia: Context Analysis”, Verlag: Mensch & Buch. 160 pp. ISBN: 978-3-86387-645-6. 2015.
P. H. Coombs, C. Prosser, and M. Ahmed, “New Paths to Learning for Rural Children and Youth”, New York: International Council for Educational Development. One of several reports involving Coombs that popularized the institutional or bureaucratic categories of informal, formal and non-formal education. See, also, P. Coombs and M. Ahmed (1974) Attacking Rural Poverty. How non-formal education can help, Baltimore: John Hopkins Press. 1973.
J. Dzerviniks, “Outdoor Learning Activities in the Field of Science in Primary Education”, INTED2023 Proceedings, pp. 2940-2949, 2023.
R. Radičuks, I. Bula-Biteniece, R. Līcis, A. Gulbe, I. Ļubinska, I. Dravniece, A. Tomašs, and A.Pīlups, “Outdoor physical education classes in the educational content of Latvian and foreign schools”, LASE Journal of Sport Science , 14(1), 55-65, 2023. https://doi.org/10.61800/lase_joss.v14i1.5
A. Ahrens, J. Zascerinska, A. Bikova, L. Aleksejeva, M. Zascerinskis, and O. Gukovica, “Emotions in Education 2050: A Forecasting Exercise”, Education. Innovation. Diversity., 2(7), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.17770/eid2023.2.7342
STEM Centre in Cesis, Latvia, Feb. 4, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://kosmosacentrs.lv.[Accessed: Feb. 4, 2025].
STEM Centre in Liepaja, Latvia, Feb. 4, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ziic.liepaja.edu.lv. [Accessed: Feb. 4, 2025].
STEM Centre in Riga, Latvia, Feb. 4, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://futurimo.lv.[Accessed: Feb. 4, 2025].
STEAM Centre in Sigulda, Latvia. Feb. 4, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://roboskola.lv/steam-centrs/. [Accessed: Feb. 4, 2025].
STEM Centre in Ventspils, Latvia, Feb. 4, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.vizium.lv. [Accessed: Feb. 4, 2025].
J. Zascerinska, S. Emet, S. Usca, S. and A. Bikova, "STEM Education: A Comparative Study of Platforms in Selected Countries," 2023 International Interdisciplinary PhD Workshop (IIPhDW), Wismar, Germany, 2023, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/IIPhDW54739.2023.10124402.
Igor Chirikov, T. Semenova, N. Maloshonok, E. Bettinger, R.F. Kizilcec,.”Online education platforms scale college STEM instruction with equivalent learning outcomes at lower cost”. Sci. Adv.6,eaay5324(2020).DOI:10.1126/sciadv.aay5324
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Andreas Ahrens, Jelena Zascerinska, Julija Melnikova, Parulkumari Bhati, Anastasija Bikova, Mihails Zascerinskis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.