FEATURE OF ENGINEERING TRAINING FOR FUTURE TECHNOLOGY TEACHERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol3.8519Keywords:
engineering training, ideological knowledge about the technological machine, interest in technical phenomena, technology teacherAbstract
A study of the ideas of future technology teachers about technical phenomena in machines showed that their interpretations are unsuitable for organizing the educational process of studying the basics of technology by students. Accordingly, they will not be able to orient lyceum graduates to engineering education. The purpose of this study was to form the interest of future technology teachers in the adapted content of engineering training, suitable for organizing specialized training of lyceum students in studying the basics of technology. The levels of cognitive interests of students were assessed according to qualitative criteria: cognitive activity, nature of interest, independence, nature of use of free time, method of overcoming cognitive difficulties. Quantitative data were collected using questionnaire and testing methods. The null hypothesis of the absence of significant differences in the level of change in students' cognitive interest in technical phenomena was not confirmed in the experimental group, but was confirmed in the control group. The results of this study are important for developing university work programs. The practical value of the research results for the training of students of non-technical specialties lies in defining the concept of a technology user for ideological knowledge about machines. The potential international value of the research results lies in defining technical phenomena in machine drive as a basic concept for the formation of a technical worldview.
References
D. G. Broo, O. Kaynak and S. M. Sait, “Rethinking engineering education at the age of industry 5.0”.Journal of Industrial Information Integration, vol. 25, p. 100311, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100311 [Accessed: Jan. 09, 2025].
Van den Beemt, M. MacLeod, J. Van der Veen, A. Van de Ven, S. Van Baalen, R. Klaassen and M. Boon, “Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support” .Journal of engineering education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 508–555, 2020 [Online]. Available:. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20347 [Accessed: Jan. 08, 2025].
T. R. Kelley, J. G. Knowles, “A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education”. International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 3, pp. 1–11, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z [Accessed: Jan. 07, 2025].
National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council, “Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects”. National Academies Press, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12635 [Accessed: Dec. 30, 2024].
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). “Recommendation concerning Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET)”. UNESCO, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245178 [Accessed: Dec. 28, 2024].
C. Mitcham, “Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy”. University of Chicago Press, 1994.
A. Ivanchuk, T. Zuziak, O. Marushchak, A. Matviichuk and V. Solovei, “Training pre-service technology teachers to develop schoolchildren’s technical literacy”. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, vol. 79, no.4, pp. 554–567, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/21.79.554 [Accessed: Feb. 01, 2025].
A. V. Ivanchuk, O. V. Marushchak and I. V. Krasylnykova, “Cvitohliadni mashynoznavchi znannia maibutnikh uchyteliv tekhnolohii” [Worldwide engineering knowledgefuture teachers of technologies]. Modern Information Technologies and Innovation Methodologies of Education in Professional Training Methodology Theory Experience Problems, vol. 73, pp. 87–99, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.31652/2412-1142-2024-73-87-100 [Accessed: Feb. 01, 2025].
J, Kropáč, “K problému uceleného pojetí výuky obecně technických předmětů”. e-Pedagogium, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 60–71, 2004. https://e-pedagogium.upol.cz/artkey/epd-200401-0007_k-problemu-uceleneho-pojeti-vyuky-obecne-technickych-predmetu.php [Accessed: Jan. 02, 2025].
M. Barak, T. Ginzburg and S. Erduran, “Nature of Engineering”. Science & Education, vol. 33, pp. 679–697, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00402-7 [Accessed: Jan. 05, 2025].
E. F. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund and D. R. Brodeur, “Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach”. New York, NY: Springer, 2007.
S. Purzer¸.J. Quintana-Cifuentes and M. Menekse, “The honeycomb ofengineering framework: Philosophy of engineering guiding precollege engineering education”. Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 19–39, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20441 [Accessed: Jan. 02, 2025].
M. Marušić, I. Mišurac, “Stupanj razumijevanja Newtonove mehanike kod budućih studenata”. Školski vjesnik: časopis za pedagogijsku teoriju i praksu, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 103–121, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.38003/sv.72.1.5 [Accessed: Jan. 02, 2025].
R. V. Ruska, “Teoriia imovirnosti ta matematychna statystyka v psykholohii” [Probability theory and mathematical statistics in psychology]. navch. posibnyk. Ternopil: ZUNU, 2020.
P. S. Lottero‐Perdue, C. P. Lachapelle, “Engineering mindsets and learning outcomes in elementary school”. Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 640–664, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20350 [Accessed: Jan. 10, 2025].
C. M. Cunningham, C. P. Lachapelle, R. T. Brennan, G. J. Kelly, C. S. A. Tunis and C. A. Gentry, “The impact of engineering curriculum design principles on elementary students' engineering and science learning”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 423–453, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21601 [Accessed: Jan. 04, 2025].
C. Hampton, D. Reeping and D. S. Ozkan, “Positionality statements in engineering education research: A look at the hand that guides the methodological tools”. .Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 126–141, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c0e4/30440c2532c237f50c143f55e08442091a97.pdf [Accessed: Jan. 11, 2025].
S. Y. Tzeng, K. C. Yu, “The Influence of Schooling Environment: A Review of Instruments Used to Evaluate Students' Attitudes toward Technology”. Journal of Technology Education, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 83–105, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v36i1.a.5 [Accessed: Feb. 01, 2025].
J. Pleasants, D. Krutka and T. P. Nichols, (2023). “What relationships do we want with technology? Toward technoskepticism in schools”. Harvard Educational Review, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 486–515. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045- 93.4.486 [Accessed: Jan. 07, 2025].
K. Geiger, J. Breitschuh und S. Matthiesen, “Denken wie ein Ingenieur–Unterrichtseinheit für Schulen zum Erleben technischen Problemlösens”. Tagungsband der, no. 11, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan-Breitschuh/publication/311102356_Denken_wie_ein_Ingenieur_Unterrichtseinheit_fur_Schulen_zum_Erleben_technischen_Problemlosens/links/583da80908aeda6968070612/Denken-wie-ein-Ingenieur-Unterrichtseinheit-fuer-Schulen-zum-Erleben-technischen-Problemloesens.pdf [Accessed: Jan. 10, 2025].
J. Daugherty, R. Dixon and C. Merrill, “Research Evidence of the Impact of Engineering Design on Technology and Engineering Education Students”. Journal of Technology Education, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 46–65, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v30i1.a.3 [Accessed: Jan. 10, 2025].
V. Lamanauskas, “Man, as the most important subject of educational activity”. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 158–161, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.158 [Accessed: Feb. 01, 2025].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anatolii Ivanchuk, Stanislav Podolyanchuk, Oksana Marushchak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.