SELECTION OF MATERIALS USING MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING. A CASE STUDY ON CELLULAR MATERIALS

Authors

  • Jekaterina Niktina Riga Technical University
  • Viktors Mironovs Riga Technical University
  • Irina Voronova Riga Technical University
  • Vladimirs Šatrevičs Riga Technical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol4.8461

Keywords:

Assessment, benefits, cellular materials, circular economy, environmental sustainability, manufacturing efficiency, perforated materials, raw materials

Abstract

In recent years, many companies have been striving to transition towards a sustainable, circular economy, focusing on the efficient use of materials and environmental protection. This has become a strategic necessity. One promising approach is the replacement of traditional sheet metals with cellular metal materials, such as perforated metal sheets, expanded metal, welded picket fences, and woven wire mesh. This substitution offers both environmental and economic benefits, while also supporting eco-technological innovations in regional industries. To evaluate the applicability of specific cellular metal materials, several factors must be considered, including the potential for weight reduction, noise reduction, and other environmental impacts. This article presents a multi-criteria decision-making methodology applied to the category of cellular materials, using the example of a perimeter fence in an urban environment. It provides a detailed overview of the types of materials, production methods, and the most significant factors of advantage. The main objective is to highlight the benefits of cellular materials. The primary objective is to highlight the benefits of cellular materials. A group expert assessment method was employed in this study. Findings indicate that perforated metal materials are most popular in properties to Cellular Materials (CMs). However, experts assess that CMs offer unique advantages in construction, design, and environmental sustainability compared to braided or expanded alternatives.

References

I. I. Dani, W.G. Drossel, N. Milaev, H. Korn, C. Hannemann, J. Hohlfeld, R. Wertheim, “Sustainability of industrial components using additive manufacturing and foam materials,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 43, pp. 10–17, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.102.

J. Banhart, “Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams,” Prog. Mater. Sci., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 559–632, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5.

R. Setiawan, A. I. Komara, and B. Budiwantoro, “Numerical and experimental investigation of aluminum double arrowhead cellular structure manufactured using sheet metal forming,” Results Eng., vol. 26, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104667.

Q. Zuo, K. He, H. Mao, X. Dang, and R. Du, “Manufacturing process and mechanical properties of a novel periodic cellular metal with closed cubic structure,” Mater. Des., vol. 153, pp. 242–258, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.011.

A. G. Evans, J. W. Hutchinson, and M. F. Ashby, “Cellular metals,” Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 288–303, 1998, doi: 10.1016/S1359-0286(98)80105-8.

European Commission, “Critical raw materials resilience: Charting a path towards greater security and sustainability.” [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/42849[Accessed April 15, 2025].

United Nations Development Programme, “Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development.” 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agend[Accessed April 15, 2025].

European Commission, “The European Green Deal,” 2019, [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en[Accessed April 15, 2025].

K. Morgan, “Smart Specialisation: Opportunities and Challenges for Regional Innovation Policy,” Reg. Stud., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 480–482, 2015, doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1007572.

H. Ruiz, P. Cobo, T. Dupont, B. Martin, and P. Leclaire, “Acoustic properties of plates with unevenly distributed macroperforations backed by woven meshes,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 3138–3147, 2012, doi: 10.1121/1.4754520.

X. Li, Q. Wu, L. Kang, and B. Liu, “Design of multiple parallel-arranged perforated panel absorbers for low frequency sound absorption,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 13, 2019, doi: 10.3390/ma12132099.

M. Mironovs, V.; Lisicins, “Perforated metal materials and their use possibilities,” RTU Publ. House, 2015.

G. W. Kooistra and H. N. G. Wadley, “Lattice truss structures from expanded metal sheet,” Mater. Des., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 507–514, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.08.013.

Z. Wang, “Recent advances in novel metallic honeycomb structure,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 166, pp. 731–741, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.011.

V. Mironovs, A. Tatarinov, and S. Gorbacova, “Expanding Application of Perforated Metal Materials in Construction and Architecture,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 251, p. 012027, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/251/1/012027.

A. Shishkin, T. Koppel, V. Mironov, I. Hussainova, J. Locs, and H. Haldre, “Microwave Reflectance and Transmittance Properties of Conductive Composite Materials,” Energy Procedia, vol. 113, pp. 354–361, May 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.04.006.

M. C. S. de Abreu, F. N. H. Ferreira, J. F. Proença, and D. Ceglia, “Collaboration in achieving sustainable solutions in the textile industry,” J. Bus. Ind. Mark, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1614–1626, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1108/JBIM-01-2020-0041.

Z. Zhao, Y. Peles, and M. K. Jensen, “Properties of plain weave metallic wire mesh screens,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 690–697, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.10.055.

J. Yip and S. P. Ng, “Study of three-dimensional spacer fabrics: Physical and mechanical properties,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 206, no. 1–3, pp. 359–364, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.073.

A. G. Evans, J. W. Hutchinson, and M. F. Ashby, “Cellular metals,” Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 288–303, Jun. 1998, doi: 10.1016/S1359-0286(98)80105-8.

C. Wang, K. Shankar, and A. Fien, “Finite element simulation of impact response of wire mesh screens,” EPJ Web Conf., vol. 94, p. 04033, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1051/epjconf/20159404033.

M. K. Sharma, S. Preet, J. Mathur, A. Chowdhury, and S. Mathur, “Thermal performance analysis of naturally ventilated and perforated sheet based double skin facade system for hot summer conditions,” Int. J. Vent., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 263–283, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1080/14733315.2021.1901003.

G. W. Kooistra and H. N. G. Wadley, “Lattice truss structures from expanded metal sheet,” Mater. Des., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 507–514, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.08.013.

G. Martínez, E. Casanova, and C. Graciano, “Failure response of expanded metal meshes subject to transversal impact,” Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct., vol. 20, no. 7, 2023, doi: 10.1590/1679-78257585.

G. Martínez, C. Graciano, and P. Teixeira, “Energy absorption of axially crushed expanded metal tubes,” Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 71, pp. 134–146, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2013.05.003.

C. Graciano, G. Martínez, and D. Smith, “Experimental investigation on the axial collapse of expanded metal tubes,” Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 47, no. 8–9, pp. 953–961, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2009.02.002.

M. D. Nouri, H. Hatami, and A. G. Jahromi, “Experimental and numerical investigation of expanded metal tube absorber under axial impact loading,” Struct. Eng. Mech., vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1245–1266, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.12989/sem.2015.54.6.1245.

E. D. G. Fraser, A. J. Dougill, W. E. Mabee, M. Reed, and P. McAlpine, “Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 114–127, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.009.

A. De Pascale, R. Arbolino, K. Szopik-Depczyńska, M. Limosani, and G. Ioppolo, “A systematic review for measuring circular economy: The 61 indicators,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 281, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124942.

S. Harris, M. Martin, and D. Diener, “Circularity for circularity’s sake? Scoping review of assessment methods for environmental performance in the circular economy.” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 26, pp. 172–186, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.018.

I. Voronova and V. Shatrevich, “Sectoral risk assessment: a case of the Latvian forestry sector,” Jun. 2020. doi: 10.3846/bm.2020.621.

A. Efimenko, I. Zlobin, A. Avilov, and A. Markov, “Application of expert evaluation method for realization of tasks in construction industry,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 91, 2019, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/20199108034.

Downloads

Published

08.06.2025

How to Cite

SELECTION OF MATERIALS USING MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING. A CASE STUDY ON CELLULAR MATERIALS. (2025). ENVIRONMENT. TECHNOLOGY. RESOURCES. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, 4, 257-263. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol4.8461