GROUND COVER VEGETATION DIVERSITY OF RIPARIAN FORESTS IN SALACA BASIN

Authors

  • Agnese Liepiņa Latvian State Forest Research Institute "Silava"
  • Mārcis Saklaurs Latvian State Forest Research Institute "Silava"
  • Liene Zēberga Latvian State Forest Research Institute "Silava"
  • Āris Jansons Latvian State Forest Research Institute "Silava"

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol1.8684

Keywords:

Herbs, Moss, Shrubs, riparian ecotones

Abstract

Riparian forests serve as ecotones, marking the transition between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and differing from the surrounding landscapes. Managing these forests has been identified as a means to enhance various ecological functions, which play a key role in erosion control, as their vegetation stabilizes soil and reduces nutrient and carbon runoff into rivers. Additionally, riverbank vegetation helps mitigate flooding and improves water quality. Currently in Latvia, the Life project “LIFE IS SALACA” encompasses riverine habitat restoration and management, which demands an assessment of the initial conditions within the study region, necessary for characterising future dynamics of rivers and streams, as well as riparian forests and ground cover vegetation development. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe and specify the current situation regarding ground cover vegetation diversity in riparian forest habitats in Salaca basin. To assess vegetation composition and structure, permanent 20×20 m (400 m²) sample plot was established in each study area. Vegetation surveys were conducted using the Braun-Banquet method, recording all vascular plant and moss species. The total projected cover (%) was estimated for four vegetation layers: tree layer (E3, trees >7 m), shrub layer (E2, shrubs and young trees 0.5–7 m), herb layer (E1, herbaceous plants, dwarf shrubs, and juvenile trees/shrubs <0.5 m), and moss layer (E0). Additionally, within these layers, the projected cover of each species was determined. The collected data will become an essential basis for monitoring riparian management processes, as well as provide valuable insight into the current vegetation diversity in the Salaca basin.

 

References

L. E. Polvi, E. Wohl, and D. M. Merritt, “Modelling the functional influence of vegetation type on streambank cohesion,” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, vol. 39, pp. 1245–1258, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3577

M. N. Futter, L. Hgbom, S. Valinia, R. A. Sponseller, and H. Laudon, “Conceptualizing and communicating management effects on forest water quality,” Ambio, vol. 45, pp. 188–202, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0753-6

J. L. J. Ledesma, M. N. Futter, M. Blackburn, F. Lidman, T. Grabs, R. A. Sponseller, H. Laudon, K. H. Bishop, and S. J. Köhler, “Towards an improved conceptualization of riparian zones in boreal forest headwaters,” Ecosystems, vol. 21, pp. 297–315, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-017-0149-5

N. Dahlström and C. Nilsson, “Influence of woody debris on channel structure in old growth and managed forest streams in central Sweden,” Environmental Management, vol. 33, pp. 376–384, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-3042-2

J. S. Richardson and R. J. Danehy, “A synthesis of the ecology of headwater streams and their riparian zones in temperate forests,” Forest Science, vol. 53, pp. 131–147, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/53.2.131

R. L. Vannote, G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell, and C. E. Cushing, “River continuum concept,” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 37, pp. 130–137, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1139/f80-017

A. Oldén, M. Peura, S. Saine, J. S. Kotiaho, and P. Halme, “The effect of buffer strip width and selective logging on riparian forest microclimate,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 453, 117623, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117623

J. Boggs, G. Sun, and S. McNulty, “Effects of timber harvest on water quantity and quality in small watersheds in the Piedmont of North Carolina,” Journal of Forestry, vol. 114, pp. 27–40, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.14-102

W. R. Hill, P. J. Mulholland, and E. R. Marzolf, “Stream ecosystem responses to forest leaf emergence in spring,” Ecology, vol. 82, pp. 2306–2319, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2306:SERTFL]2.0.CO;2

V. Ferreira, J. Castela, P. Rosa, A. M. Tonin, L. Boyero, and M. A. S. Graça, “Aquatic hyphomycetes, benthic macroinvertebrates and leaf litter decomposition in streams naturally differing in riparian vegetation,” Aquatic Ecology, vol. 50, pp. 711–725, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-016-9588-x

S. J. Dugdale, I. A. Malcolm, K. Kantola, and D. M. Hannah, “Stream temperature under contrasting riparian forest cover: Understanding thermal dynamics and heat exchange processes,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 610–611, pp. 1375–1389, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.198

S. Zubek, K. Rożek, D. Chmolowska, I. Odriozola, T. Větrovský, K. Skubała, and P. Baldrian, “Dominant herbaceous plants contribute to the spatial heterogeneity of beech and riparian forest soils by influencing fungal and bacterial diversity,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 193, p. 109405, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109405

B. Jobin, L. Bélanger, C. Boutin, and C. Maisonneuve, “Conservation value of agricultural riparian strips in the Boyer River watershed, Québec (Canada),” Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, vol. 103, pp. 413–423, 2004.

J. L. Sabo, R. Sponseller, M. Dixon, K. Gade, T. Harms, J. Heffernan, A. Jani, G. Katz, C. Soykan, J. Watts, and J. Welter, “Riparian zones increase regional species richness by harboring different, not more, species,” Ecology, vol. 86, pp. 56–62, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2003.12.014

S. Brakenhielms and Q. Liu, “Long-term effects of clear-felling on vegetation dynamics and species diversity in a boreal pine forest,” Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 7, pp. 207–220, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008836502640

K. Hylander, M. Dynesius, B. G. Jonsson, and C. Nilsson, “Substrate form determines the fate of bryophytes in riparian buffer strips,” Ecological Applications, vol. 15, pp. 674–688, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0570

J. Bergstedt and P. Milberg, “The impact of logging intensity on field-layer vegetation in Swedish boreal forests,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 154, pp. 105–115, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00642-3

J. Brunet, U. Falkengren-Grerup, and G. Tyler, “Herb layer vegetation of south Swedish beech and oak forests – effects of management and soil acidity during one decade,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 88, pp. 259–272, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03845-5

M. D. Bejarano, Á. Sordo-Ward, C. Alonso, R. Jansson, and C. Nilsson, “Hydropeaking affects germination and establishment of riverbank vegetation,” Ecological Applications, vol. 30, e02076, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2076

L. Kuglerová, E. M. Hasselquist, R. A. Sponseller, T. Muotka, G. Hallsby, and H. Laudon, “Multiple stressors in small streams in the forestry context of Fennoscandia: the effects in time and space,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 756, p. 143521, 2021.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143521

I. Harris, T. J. Osborn, P. Jones, and D. Lister, “Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset,” Scientific Data, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3

J. Braun-Blanquet, Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, Springer Verlag, Wien, 1964.

R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2024. Available: https://www.R-project.org/.

J. Paal, R. Rannik, E. M. Jeletsky, and N. Prieditis, “Floodplain forests in Estonia: Typological diversity and growth conditions,” Folia Geobotanica, vol. 42, pp. 383–400, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861701

K. Hylander and M. Dynesius, “Causes of the large variation in bryophyte species richness and composition among boreal streamside forests,” Journal of Vegetation Science, vol. 17, pp. 333–346, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02453.x

A. Auniņš, Eiropas Savienības aizsargājamie biotopi Latvijā. Noteikšanas rokasgrāmata. 2. papildināts izdevums, Latvijas Dabas fonds, Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija, Rīga, 2013, 320 lpp.

D. Sauer, H. Sponagel, M. Sommer, L. Giani, R. Jahn, and K. Stahr, “Review Article: Podzol – Soil of the Year 2007. A review on its genesis, occurrence, and functions,” Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, vol. 170, pp. 581–597, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200700135

P. Lochin, H. Piégay, J. C. Stella, K. K. Caylor, L. Vaudor, and M. Bliss Singer, “Drivers of spatiotemporal patterns of riparian forest NDVI along a hydroclimatic gradient,” Ecohydrology, e2729, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2729

Downloads

Published

11.06.2025

How to Cite

GROUND COVER VEGETATION DIVERSITY OF RIPARIAN FORESTS IN SALACA BASIN. (2025). ENVIRONMENT. TECHNOLOGY. RESOURCES. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, 1, 325-329. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol1.8684